Impact of different front-of-pack nutrition labels on foods according to their nutritional quality: A comparative study in Mexico

4Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. This study aimed to compare consumers' objective understanding of five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), Warning Symbol] in Mexico. Materials and methods. 1 001 Mexican consumers were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products according to their nutritional quality, via a survey. Upon completion of this task, participants were randomized to one of five FoPL conditions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Change in ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks was assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. Results. Nutri-Score and MTL performed best, followed Warning Symbol, HSR and RIs. Conclusion. Nutri-Score and MTL appear as efficient schemes to inform consumers on the nutritional quality of foods, in particular in Mexico, where it would be a helpful tool for consumers in purchasing situations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernández-Nava, L. G., Egnell, M., Aguilar-Salinas, C. A., Córdova-Villalobos, J. Á., Barriguete-Meléndez, J. A., Pettigrew, S., … Galán, P. (2019). Impact of different front-of-pack nutrition labels on foods according to their nutritional quality: A comparative study in Mexico. Salud Publica de Mexico, 61(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.21149/10318

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free