Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias

28Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study publication bias in meta-analysis by supposing there is a population (y, σ) of studies which give treatment effect estimates y ∼ N(θ, σ2). A selection function describes the probability that each study is selected for review. The overall estimate of θ depends on the studies selected, and hence on the (unknown) selection function. Our previous paper, Copas and Jackson (2004, Biometrics 60, 146-153), studied the maximum bias over all possible selection functions which satisfy the weak condition that large studies (small σ) are as likely, or more likely, to be selected than small studies (large σ). This led to a worst-case sensitivity analysis, controlling for the overall fraction of studies selected. However, no account was taken of the effect of selection on the uncertainty in estimation. This article extends the previous work by finding corresponding confidence intervals and P-values, and hence a new sensitivity analysis for publication bias. Two examples are discussed. © 2006, The International Biometric Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henmi, M., Copas, J. B., & Eguchi, S. (2007). Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias. Biometrics, 63(2), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00705.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free