University teachers engaged in critical self-regulation: How may they influence their students?

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We outline a new model for teacher learning, critical self-regulation (CSR). CSR is an aspirational model for the reflective processes that can underpin continuing professional development of university teachers. We propose a four-phase model of CSR that draws on the student learning literatures of metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL), and critical reflection from adult education. To Zimmerman's three-phase model of SRL, we add a prior stage that includes teachers' reflection on the basic premises of their instruction and consideration of higher-order instructional goals. At the appraisal end of the process, the evaluation phase of SRL is extended to incorporate critical (or premise) reflection. We argue that critical reflection provides a qualitatively different and a deeper reflection than the reflection referred to in existing metacognition and SRL models. Following the presentation of the model of CSR, situations and tools for developing CSR are considered. We focus on learning that arises because of the perceived need by the teacher to address some learning or teaching dilemma. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Brew, A., & Ainley, M. (2010). University teachers engaged in critical self-regulation: How may they influence their students? In Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research (pp. 427–444). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free