Imagination and representation: Metaphor of designing thought

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proposed work investigates the relationship between the word and its possible two-dimensional representation. Oral production and graphic-visual production are very different from each other, but they are a full-fledged language, because they are characterized by a code and a content of the message. In particular, it examines words-actions of architectural design thinking. These are graphic compositions that explain the meaning of an action and allude to a verbal description. The image becomes a graphic metaphor of the word action, with experimental and explorative intent. The compositional act establishes a bi-univocal relationship between the meaning and the image. The difference between the meaning and the hypothetical representation produces a solicitation of the imagination. The goal is to support and reiterate the centrality of Design as a primary operation of architectural thinking and all the compositional-design operations. It is the concrete place in which thought is manifested and produced. There is no verbal thought and then a graphic thought, as an exterior form of the former whose purpose is only communicative. Drawing is itself Thought (hence Word), a place where the idea is formed, produced and evolved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cianci, M. G., Calisi, D., Colaceci, S., & Molinari, M. (2020). Imagination and representation: Metaphor of designing thought. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1140, pp. 369–382). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41018-6_31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free