SMAUG: Analyzing single-molecule tracks with nonparametric Bayesian statistics

32Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy probes nanoscale, subcellular biology in real time. Existing methods for analyzing single-particle tracking data provide dynamical information, but can suffer from supervisory biases and high uncertainties. Here, we develop a method for the case of multiple interconverting species undergoing free diffusion and introduce a new approach to analyzing single-molecule trajectories: the Single-Molecule Analysis by Unsupervised Gibbs sampling (SMAUG) algorithm, which uses nonparametric Bayesian statistics to uncover the whole range of information contained within a single-particle trajectory dataset. Even in complex systems where multiple biological states lead to a number of observed mobility states, SMAUG provides the number of mobility states, the average diffusion coefficient of single molecules in that state, the fraction of single molecules in that state, the localization noise, and the probability of transitioning between two different states. In this paper, we provide the theoretical background for the SMAUG analysis and then we validate the method using realistic simulations of single-particle trajectory datasets as well as experiments on a controlled in vitro system. Finally, we demonstrate SMAUG on real experimental systems in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes to measure the motions of the regulatory protein TcpP in Vibrio cholerae and the dynamics of the B-cell receptor antigen response pathway in lymphocytes. Overall, SMAUG provides a mathematically rigorous approach to measuring the real-time dynamics of molecular interactions in living cells.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karslake, J. D., Donarski, E. D., Shelby, S. A., Demey, L. M., DiRita, V. J., Veatch, S. L., & Biteen, J. S. (2021). SMAUG: Analyzing single-molecule tracks with nonparametric Bayesian statistics. Methods, 193, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.03.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free