Two-stage stochastic matching with application to ride hailing

15Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study a two-stage stochastic matching problem motivated in part by applications in online marketplaces used for ride hailing. Using a randomized primal-dual algorithm applied to a family of “balancing” convex programs, we obtain the optimal 3/4 competitive ratio against the optimum offline benchmark. These balancing convex programs offer a natural generalization of the matching skeleton by Goel et al. (2012) and may be of independent interest. Switching to the more precise benchmark of optimum online, we exploit connections to submodular optimization and use a factor-revealing program to improve the 3/4 ratio to (1 − 1/e + 1/e2) ≈ 0.767 for the unweighted and 0.761 for the weighted case. We also show it is NP-hard to obtain an FPTAS with respect to this benchmark.

References Powered by Scopus

A Threshold of ln n for Approximating Set Cover

2338Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a matroid constraint

676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal algorithm for on-line bipartite matching

599Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The greedy algorithm is not optimal for on-line edge coloring

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Online Matching with Stochastic Rewards: Optimal Competitive Ratio via Path-Based Formulation

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Pricing Mechanism for Ride-Hailing Systems in the Presence of Driver Acceptance Uncertainty

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feng, Y., Niazadeh, R., & Saberi, A. (2021). Two-stage stochastic matching with application to ride hailing. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (pp. 2862–2877). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976465.170

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

40%

Physics and Astronomy 1

20%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

20%

Mathematics 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free