Comprehensive analysis of correlations among codon usage bias, gene expression, and substitution rate in Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaënsis orthologs

38Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The relationship between evolutionary rates and gene expression in model plant orthologs is well documented. However, little is known about the relationships between gene expression and evolutionary trends in Arachis orthologs. We identified 7,435 one-to-one orthologs, including 925 single-copy and 6,510 multiple-copy sequences in Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaënsis. Codon usage was stronger for shorter polypeptides, which were encoded by codons with higher GC contents. Highly expressed coding sequences had higher codon usage bias, GC content, and expression breadth. Additionally, expression breadth was positively correlated with polypeptide length, but there was no correlation between gene expression and polypeptide length. Inferred selective pressure was also negatively correlated with both gene expression and expression breadth in all one-to-one orthologs, while positively but non-significantly correlated with gene expression in sequences with signatures of positive selection. Gene expression levels and expression breadth were significantly higher for single-copy genes than for multiple-copy genes. Similarly, the gene expression and expression breadth in sequences with signatures of purifying selection were higher than those of sequences with positive selective signatures. These results indicated that gene expression differed between single-copy and multiple-copy genes as well as sequences with signatures of positive and purifying selection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, H., Gao, H., Liu, J., Tian, P., & Nan, Z. (2017). Comprehensive analysis of correlations among codon usage bias, gene expression, and substitution rate in Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaënsis orthologs. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13981-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free