Developments in Australian general practice 2000-2002: What did these contribute to a well functioning and comprehensive Primary Health Care System?

18Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, national and state/territory governments have undertaken an increasing number of initiatives to strengthen general practice and improve its links with the rest of the primary health care sector. This paper reviews how far these initiatives were contributing to a well functioning and comprehensive primary-health care system during the period 2000-2002, using a normative model of primary health care and data from a descriptive study to evaluate progress. Results: There was a significant number of programs, at both state/territory and national level. Most focused on individual care, particularly for chronic disease, rather than population health approaches. There was little evidence of integration across programs: each tended to be based in and focus on a single jurisdiction, and build capacity chiefly within the services funded through that jurisdiction. As a result, the overall effect was patchy, with similar difficulties being noted across all jurisdictions and little gain in overall system capacity for effective primary health care. Conclusion: Efforts to develop more effective primary health care need a more balanced approach to reform, with a better balance across the different elements of primary health care and greater integration across programs and jurisdictions. One way ahead is to form a single funding agency, as in the UK and New Zealand, and so remove the need to work across jurisdictions and manage their competing interests. A second, perhaps less politically challenging starting point, is to create an agreed framework for primary health care within which a collective vision for primary health care can be developed, based on population health needs, and the responsibilities of different sectors services can be negotiated. Either of these approaches would be assisted by a more systematic and comprehensive program of research and evaluation for primary health care. © 2006 Davies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davies, G. P., Hu, W., McDonald, J., Furler, J., Harris, E., & Harris, M. F. (2006, January 15). Developments in Australian general practice 2000-2002: What did these contribute to a well functioning and comprehensive Primary Health Care System? Australia and New Zealand Health Policy. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free