Are extremal hypotheses not consistent with regime alluvial channels?

6Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper discusses the possibility of applying either variational or rational methods in order to evaluate the stable configuration of alluvial channels and the effects of manmade narrowings along degraded and aggraded rivers. A variational approach based on the Minimum Stream Power principle is here proposed, results of which agree fairly well with laboratory and field data. Nevertheless, due to the lack of a consolidated theoretical framework, it cannot certainly be concluded that a variational approach is the best method to apply, though no better results have been obtained by using existing rational methods. -Author

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pianese, D. (1992). Are extremal hypotheses not consistent with regime alluvial channels? Entropy and Energy Dissipation in Water Resources, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2430-0_31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free