In defence of societal sovereignty: A comment on Nyman 'the inclusion of survivor consumption in CUA'

20Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Whether to include or exclude consumption costs and costs of unrelated illnesses in economic evaluation is not a technical issue which may be answered by reference to individuals alone and the consistency of the treatment of individual costs and benefits. In the context of a publicly funded health service the relevant costs and benefits may differ from those normally included in evaluation studies. Specifically, the social welfare function is likely to exclude benefits which would result in preferential care for wealthier members of society. But this conclusion must be established by analysis of social, not individual, values. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richardson, J. R. J., & Olsen, J. A. (2006). In defence of societal sovereignty: A comment on Nyman “the inclusion of survivor consumption in CUA.” Health Economics, 15(3), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free