Automatic hip abductor muscle fat fraction estimation and association with early OA cartilage degeneration biomarkers

5Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an automatic segmentation method for hip abductor muscles and find their fat fraction associations with early stage hip osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage degeneration biomarkers. This Institutional Review Board approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant prospective study recruited 61 patients with evidence of hip OA or Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI). Magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired for cartilage segmentation, T1ρ and T2 relaxation times computation and grading of cartilage lesion scores. A 3D V-Net (Dice loss, Adam optimizer, learning rate = 1e−4, batch size = 3) was trained to segment the three muscles (gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and tensor fascia latae). The V-Net performance was measured using Dice, distance maps between manual and automatic masks, and Bland-Altman plots of the fat fractions and volumes. Associations between muscle fat fraction and T1ρ, T2 relaxation times values were found using voxel based relaxometry (VBR). A p < 0.05 was considered significant. The V-Net had a Dice of 0.90, 0.88, and 0.91 (GMed, GMin, and TFL). The VBR results found associations of fat fraction of all three muscles in early stage OA and FAI patients with T1ρ, T2 relaxation times. Using an automatic, validated segmentation model, the associations derived between OA biomarkers and muscle fat fractions provide insight into early changes that occur in OA, and show that hip abductor muscle fat is associated with markers of cartilage degeneration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tibrewala, R., Pedoia, V., Lee, J., Kinnunen, C., Popovic, T., Zhang, A. L., … Majumdar, S. (2021). Automatic hip abductor muscle fat fraction estimation and association with early OA cartilage degeneration biomarkers. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 39(11), 2376–2387. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free