Mechanical properties of y2O3-slabilized ZrO 2 polycrystals fabricated by the solid phase mixing and sintering method

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The flexural strength and fracture toughness of 2.8 mol% Y 2O3-stabilized zirconia polycrystals were investigated. The polycrystals were fabricated by sintering powders prepared by two different methods; the solid phase method (SPM), which involved wet dispersing and mixing using an agitator mill, and the liquid phase precipitation method (LPM). In the case of the LPM sample, the compressive residual stress on the polished surface was lower than of the SPM sample and did not depend on the grain size, while the monoclinic phase fraction on the fracture surface increased with an increase in the grain size. By contrast, for the SPM sample, the compressive residual stress depended on the grain size, and the monoclinic phase fraction on the fracture surface revealed the tendency to decrease with an increase in the grain size. The flexural strength and fracture toughness of the LPM sample were greatly influenced by the stress-induced transformation. However, mechanical properties and transformation behavior of the SPM sample in relation to grain size implied that the SPM sample was dominated not only by the stressinduced transformation but also by the compressive residual stress and the microcracks generated by the transformation. For both SPM and LPM samples, the relationship between the transformed volume Vf√h, where Vf is the tetragonal phase fraction and h is the transformed depth, and the fracture toughness was linear. The fracture toughness for the SPM sample was more strongly influenced by Vf√h than that of the LPM sample. © 2008 The Ceramic Society of Japan. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohnishi, H., Naka, H., Sekino, T., Ikuhara, Y., & Niihara, K. (2008). Mechanical properties of y2O3-slabilized ZrO 2 polycrystals fabricated by the solid phase mixing and sintering method. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 116(1351), 491–496. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.116.491

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free