Socrative in Teaching Tenses: Indonesian Students and Lecturers’ Perceptions

  • Mohamad M
  • Lestari D
  • Zahidi A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mastering a language not only involves four language skills—listening, speaking, reading, and writing—but also mastering the grammar and vo- cabulary of the language. This research was intended to investigate the per- ceptions of Indonesian undergraduates and their lecturers at the Islamic University of Riau toward the use of Socrative in grammar class specifically tenses. This study employed a quantitative research design. The respondents were 34 sixth-semester undergraduates who were randomly chosen and two grammar lecturers at the English Department of Islamic University of Riau in the academic year 2016/2017. The questionnaire was adapted from the tech- nology acceptance model (TAM) by Davis, which consists of two specific variables: Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Before the ques- tionnaire was employed in this study, a pilot study was carried out to ensure the validity and reliability of the instrument. The findings of the research show the majority of respondents have positive perceptions toward Socrative. The students and lecturers provide positive responses with regard to “per- ceived usefulness and ease of use” of Socrative in grammar class. It is hoped that this tool not only could be used in grammar class but also in all aspects of English language learning. It is also expected that this research could assist Indonesian educators to teach more creatively.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohamad, M., Lestari, D. D., Zahidi, A. M., & Matore, M. E. M. (2019). Socrative in Teaching Tenses: Indonesian Students and Lecturers’ Perceptions. Creative Education, 10(01), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.101010

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 3

27%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Linguistics 3

27%

Psychology 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free