Limits to Freedom of Expression? considerations arising from the Danish cartoons affair

38Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The distress and anger caused by the publication in a Danish newspaper of cartoons containing satirical depictions of the Prophet Mahommed is the starting point for an exploration of the dimensions of the right to freedom of expression contained in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Related rights and duties to the community are examined alongside the explicit limitations on freedom of expression contained in the Declaration. The principles of harm and of offence as set out respectively by Mill and Feinberg are applied to the problem, and the concept of proportionality in interpreting laws, and the exercise of decorum in satirical comedy are also discussed. The need for librarians to adopt policies for controversial materials, which defend freedom of expression and freedom of access to information whilst respecting community sensitivities is reasserted. © 2006, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sturges, P. (2006). Limits to Freedom of Expression? considerations arising from the Danish cartoons affair. IFLA Journal, 32(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035206070164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free