Probabilistic bisimulation and equivalence for security analysis of network protocols

30Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using a probabilistic polynomial-time process calculus designed for specifying security properties as observational equivalences, we develop a form of bisimulation that justifies an equational proof system. This proof system is sufficiently powerful to derive the semantic security of El Gamal encryption from the Decision Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption. The proof system can also derive the converse: if El Gamal is secure, then DDH holds. While these are not new cryptographic results, these example proofs show the power of probabilistic bisimulation and equational reasoning for protocol security. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

New Directions in Cryptography

10610Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Public Key Cryptosystem and a Signature Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms

5229Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Probabilistic encryption

2605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Automated verification of selected equivalences for security protocols

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Protocol Composition Logic (PCL)

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A computationally sound mechanized prover for security protocols

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramanathan, A., Mitchell, J., Scedrov, A., & Teague, V. (2004). Probabilistic bisimulation and equivalence for security analysis of network protocols. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2987, 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24727-2_33

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 9

82%

Social Sciences 1

9%

Engineering 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free