Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication

11Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Individuals can feel more motivated to change health behaviour when perceiving autonomy-support, as induced through non-pressuring message phrasing and the provision of choice: autonomy-supportive message framing. Additionally, controlling message phrasing – commands that do not provide choice – can thwart autonomy and lead to reactance, which is detrimental to the persuasiveness of health messages. Many health messages have not been formulated in an autonomy-supportive manner and therefore could arouse reactance, resulting in reduced intervention effectiveness. We aimed to test the effects of autonomy-supportive vs. controlling alcohol reduction message frames on individuals’ perceived autonomy-support from these messages; and their reactance towards the message while considering the individual need for autonomy in the context of an online computer-tailored alcohol reduction intervention. A 2 (autonomy-supportive language vs. controlling language) × 2 (choice vs. no choice) between-subjects experiment (N = 521) was conducted using an online computer-tailored alcohol reduction intervention. Outcome measures were perceived autonomy-support and reactance and we investigated whether an individual’s need for autonomy moderated the effect of autonomy-supportive and controlling message frames on those outcome variables. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that neither autonomy-supportive nor controlling message frames had significant effects on perceived autonomy-support or reactance, and there was no moderation from the need for autonomy. Overall, participants evaluated the intervention as positive and perceived high levels of autonomy-support, regardless of the message frame used. Future research needs to test whether the positive intervention evaluation is due to content tailoring, and whether more distinguishable manipulations of message frames could be effective.

References Powered by Scopus

Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

27139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior

19044Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors

6838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tailored health communication: Opportunities and challenges in the digital era

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Careless Responding in Crowdsourced Alcohol Research: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Practices and Prevalence

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying the most autonomy-supportive message frame in digital health communication: A 2x2 between-subjects experiment

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altendorf, M. B., van Weert, J. C. M., Hoving, C., & Smit, E. S. (2019). Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication. Digital Health, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619832767

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

54%

Researcher 7

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

46%

Psychology 7

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

17%

Computer Science 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0