The Slippery Slope: Struggling for Equity in the Academy in the Era of #MeToo

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The complexity of the sexual harassment language of the #MeToo movement creates discontinuities that may muddy intended communications. Yet understanding this language provides a fuller picture of the experiences that women face. Gender harassment has persisted in the workplace despite long-standing antidiscrimination policies, perhaps because of a universal failure to recognize all forms of it—some of which are more pervasive and common than sexual abuse. This article considers the ability of the academy to affect sexual harassment in public administration. It discusses the implications of gender harassment, the least recognized form of sexual harassment, and makes recommendations for overcoming gender barriers in the academy and in practice. Evidence-based guidance for advancing women in the academy may create more equitable and just spaces for teaching and learning. Public administration classrooms and scholarship represent critical opportunities to recognize patterns of organizational practice and systematically redress gender harassment in the workplace.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knepper, H. J., Scutelnicu, G., & Tekula, R. (2020). The Slippery Slope: Struggling for Equity in the Academy in the Era of #MeToo. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1111–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free