Deontic technology perceptions: a complementary view to instrumental perspectives on technology acceptance and use

  • Perrigino M
  • Dunford B
  • Boss R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose For decades, organizational research has primarily considered instrumental technology perceptions (ITP) – emphasizing how technology impacts the personal interests of end users themselves – to understand technology acceptance. The authors offer a complementary paradigm by introducing deontic technology perceptions (DTP), defined as the degree to which individuals believe that the technology they use is beneficial to other individuals beyond themselves (e.g. beneficial to customers). Design/methodology/approach The authors collected quantitative survey-based data from three different hospitals located in the United States. On the basis of conservation of resources theory, the authors investigated whether both DTP and ITP were associated with improved work-related well-being. Findings Two pilot studies (n = 161 and n = 311 nurses) substantiated our DTP conceptualization. Our primary study (n = 346 nurses) found support for the association between DTP and improved work-related well-being. Evidence for the relationship between ITP and work-related well-being was mixed and the authors did not find a statistically significant interaction between DTP and ITP. Originality/value The authors build on decades of research on technology acceptance by complementing it with our deontic perspective. Our work demonstrates that technology users pay attention and react meaningfully to how their use of technology impacts not only themselves but also external parties like patients, customers and members of the general public.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perrigino, M. B., Dunford, B. B., Boss, R. W., Troup, M., & Boss, D. S. (2023). Deontic technology perceptions: a complementary view to instrumental perspectives on technology acceptance and use. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 5(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-08-2022-0103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free