Testing for dependence on tree structures

13Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tree structures, showing hierarchical relationships and the latent structures between samples, are ubiquitous in genomic and biomedical sciences. A common question in many studies is whether there is an association between a response variable measured on each sample and the latent group structure represented by some given tree. Currently, this is addressed on an ad hoc basis, usually requiring the user to decide on an appropriate number of clusters to prune out of the tree to be tested against the response variable. Here, we present a statistical method with statistical guarantees that tests for association between the response variable and a fixed tree structure across all levels of the tree hierarchy with high power while accounting for the overall false positive error rate. This enhances the robustness and reproducibility of such findings.

References Powered by Scopus

MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers

8687Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer

8181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microbiology: Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora

6413Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Inferring the allelic series at QTL in multiparental populations

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Taking account of genomics in quantitative microbial risk assessment: what methods? what issues?

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reconstruction of Tree Network via Evolutionary Game Data Analysis

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Behr, M., Azim Ansari, M., Munk, A., & Holmes, C. (2020). Testing for dependence on tree structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(18), 9787–9792. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912957117

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

50%

Researcher 10

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

43%

Computer Science 5

22%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

22%

Mathematics 3

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free