Different binding strategies for the different stages of visual recognition

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many think attention needs an executive to allocate resources. Although the cortex exhibits substantial plasticity, dynamic allocation of neurons seems outside its capability. Suppose instead that the processing structure is fixed, but can be 'tuned' to task needs. The only resource that can be allocated is time. How can this fixed structure be used over periods of time longer than one feed-forward pass? Can the Selective Tuning model provide the answer? This short paper has one goal, that of explaining a single figure (Fig.1), that puts forward the proposal that by using multiple passes of the visual processing hierarchy, both bottom-up and top-down, and using task information to tune the processing prior to each pass, we can explain the different recognition behaviors that human vision exhibits. To accomplish this, four different kinds of binding processes are introduced and are tied directly to specific recognition tasks and their time course. © 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsotsos, J. K., Rodriguez-Sanchez, A. J., Rothenstein, A. L., & Simine, E. (2007). Different binding strategies for the different stages of visual recognition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4729 LNCS, pp. 150–160). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75555-5_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free