Performance of message-passing MATLAB toolboxes

15Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this work we compare some of the freely available parallel Toolboxes for MATLAB, which differ in purpose and implementation details: while DP-Toolbox and MultiMATLAB offer a higher-level parallel environment, the goals of PVMTB and MPITB, developed by us [7], are to closely adhere to the PVM system and MPI standard, respectively. DP-Toolbox is also based on PVM, and MultiMATLAB on MPI. These Toolboxes allow the user to build a parallel application under the rapid-prototyping MATLAB environment. The differences between them are illustrated by means of a performance test and a simple case study frequently found in the literature. Thus, depending on the preferred message-passing software and the performance requirements of the application, the user can either choose a higher-level Toolbox and benefit from easier coding, or directly interface the message-passing routines and benefit from greater control and performance. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández, J., Cañas, A., Díaz, A. F., González, J., Ortega, J., & Prieto, A. (2003). Performance of message-passing MATLAB toolboxes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2565, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36569-9_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free