Life expectancy in long-Term institutional care by marital status: Multistate life table estimates for older finnish men and women

22Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives.We estimate (a) probabilities of moving to and from long-Term institutional care and probabilities of death and (b) life expectancy in the community and in care by gender and marital status.Method.A 40% random sample of Finns aged 65+ at the end of 1997 (n = 301,263) drawn from the population register was linked with register-based information on sociodemographic characteristics, entry and exit dates for long-Term institutional care, and dates of death in 1998-2003. Probabilities and life expectancies were estimated using multistate life tables.Results.At age 65, women are expected to spend more of their remaining lifetime in institutions than men (1.6 and 0.7 years, respectively). These care expectancies remain similar even for survivors to very advanced ages. Gender differences are driven by women's higher chances of entering institutions at ages above 80 years and lower chances of exit. At age 65, 59% of women and 36% of men will ever enter long-Term institutions. The married spend less of their longer life expectancy in institutions than the non-married. The large gender difference in care use exists within each marital status group.Discussion.The resources that are needed to provide long-Term care services will increase as age of death increases. We demonstrate significantly longer care expectancy among women and among the unmarried. © 2013 © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martikainen, P., Moustgaard, H., Einiö, E., & Murphy, M. (2014). Life expectancy in long-Term institutional care by marital status: Multistate life table estimates for older finnish men and women. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free