Background: The Internet offers a great amount of health related websites, but concern has been raised about their reliability. Several subjective evaluation criteria and websites rating systems have been proposed as a help for the Internet users to distinguish among web resources with different quality, but their efficacy has not been proven. Objective: To evaluate the agreement of a subset of Internet rating systems editorial boards regarding their evaluations of a sample of pediatric websites. To evaluate certain websites characteristics as possible quality indicators for pediatric websites. Methods: Comparative survey of the results of systematic evaluations of the contents and formal aspects of a sample of pediatric websites, with the number of daily visits to those websites, the time since their last update, the impact factor of their authors or editors, and the number of websites linked to them. Results: 363 websites were compiled from eight rating systems. Only 25 were indexed and evaluated by at least two rating systems. This subset included more updated and more linked websites. There was no correlation among the results of the evaluation of these 25 websites by the rating systems. The number of inbound links to the websites significantly correlated with their updating frequency (p
CITATION STYLE
Hernández-Borges, A. A., Macías-Cervi, P., Gaspar-Guardado, M. A., Torres-Álvarez De Arcaya, M. L., Ruiz-Rabaza, A., & Jiménez-Sosa, A. (1999). Can examination of WWW usage statistics and other indirect quality indicators help to distinguish the relative quality of medical websites? Journal of Medical Internet Research. JMIR Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1.1.e1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.