Stakeholders' views of supporting asthma management in schools with a school-based asthma programme for primary school children: a qualitative study in Malaysia

3Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective The WHO Global School Health Initiative aimed to improve child and community health through health promotion programmes in schools, though most focus on preventing communicable disease. Despite WHO recommendations, no asthma programme is included in the Malaysian national school health service guideline. Therefore, we aimed to explore the views of school staff, healthcare professionals and policy-makers about the challenges of managing asthma in schools and the potential of a school asthma programme for primary school children. Design A focus group and individual interview qualitative study using purposive sampling of participants to obtain diverse views. Data collection was guided by piloted semistructured topic guides. The focus groups and interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. We completed data collection once data saturation was reached. Setting Stakeholders in education and health sectors in Malaysia. Participants Fifty-two participants (40 school staff, 9 healthcare professionals and 3 policy-makers) contributed to nine focus groups and eleven individual interviews. Results School staff had limited awareness of asthma and what to do in emergencies. There was no guidance on asthma management in government schools, and teachers were unclear about their role in school children's health. These uncertainties led to delays in the treatment of asthma symptoms/attacks, and suggestions that an asthma education programme and a school plan would improve asthma care. Perceived challenges in conducting school health programmes included a busy school schedule and poor parental participation. A tailored asthma programme in partnerships with schools could facilitate the programme's adoption and implementation. Conclusions Identifying and addressing issues and challenges specific to the school and wider community could facilitate the delivery of a school asthma programme in line with the WHO School Health Initiative. Clarity over national policy on the roles and responsibilities of school staff could support implementation and guide appropriate and prompt response to asthma emergencies in schools.

References Powered by Scopus

Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys

3524Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance

1057Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry

936Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A cross-country qualitative analysis of teachers’ perceptions of asthma care in sub-Saharan Africa

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Qualitative research influencing guideline and policy: An exemplar of the development of a national school asthma guideline in Malaysia

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and feasibility study of a Culturally Tailored Asthma intervention using a mixed-method approach at the primary school level in Malaysia: Challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramdzan, S. N., Khoo, E. M., Liew, S. M., Cunningham, S., & Pinnock, H. (2022). Stakeholders’ views of supporting asthma management in schools with a school-based asthma programme for primary school children: a qualitative study in Malaysia. BMJ Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052058

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

42%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

17%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0