Of Principal(s') Interest? A Disaggregated, Multiple Principals' Approach to Commission Discretion

15Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How much discretion does the Commission enjoy in the European Union? To address this question, we draw on principal–agent theory and propose ‘interest in a decision’ by principals as a proxy for agent discretion. This has three advantages over existing approaches. First, it overcomes the high-conflict bias of case studies. Second, it accounts for the phenomenon of rational anticipation. Third, it allows for a more fine-grained measurement than analyses of the act of delegation. Empirically, we disaggregate the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) into 27 chapters and account for multiple principals. We use surveys and interviews with Commission negotiators, which we triangulate with publicly available data sources. Our findings paint a picture of a Commission that is constrained rather tightly. While the Council follows all chapters and acts as a ‘safety net’, citizens and the European Parliament act as fire alarms and focus on selected, often overlapping, chapters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gastinger, M., & Adriaensen, J. (2019). Of Principal(s’) Interest? A Disaggregated, Multiple Principals’ Approach to Commission Discretion. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12801

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free