Social and human rights impact assessments: what can they learn from each other?

47Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Abstract: We examine key commonalities and differences between social impact assessment (SIA) and human rights impact assessment (HRIA) conducted for private sector projects to consider what these two fields might learn from each other. As HRIA is an emerging practice, current approaches are diverse and there is a lack of a robust understanding about how HRIA and SIA relate to each other. We suggest that the two fields have much in common in terms of: their objective to identify and address adverse impacts; their focus on process as well as outcomes; and their consideration of how to ensure the meaningful inclusion of vulnerable individuals and groups. However, there is also significant divergence in terms of: the standards applied; the relevance of project benefits; and the recognition of stakeholders as rights-holders and duty-bearers. We suggest that the further exploration of these areas of difference has the potential to create valuable cross-learning between SIA and HRIA, as well as the potential to open up spaces for joint initiatives where the two fields might address current shortcomings together.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Götzmann, N., Vanclay, F., & Seier, F. (2016). Social and human rights impact assessments: what can they learn from each other? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1096036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free