The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: A systematic review

72Citations
Citations of this article
300Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Quadriceps or Q-angle is an index of the vector for the combined pull of the extensor mechanisms and the patellar tendon. It is used as an indicator for patellofemoral joint dysfunction. The purpose of this article is to systematically review and appraise the literature to determine the reliability and validity of this test. An electronic database search was performed accessing AMED, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, ovid Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PsycINFO, Pubmed and Zetoc to April 2008. All English language, human subject, clinical trials, assessing the inter- or intra-tester reliability, or the criterion validity, were included. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme appraisal tool was used to establish the methodological quality of each study. Ten articles including 569 control and 179 patellofemoral disorder knees were reviewed. The findings suggest that there is considerable disagreement on the reliability and validity of the clinical Q-angle measurement. This may be due to a lack of standardisation in the measurement procedure. Further study is advocated to re-evaluate this topic using well-designed, and sufficiently large observational studies of specific patellofemoral dysfunction populations. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, T. O., Hunt, N. J., & Donell, S. T. (2008). The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: A systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 16(12), 1068–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0643-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free