Transpiration efficiency and apparent cuticular transpiration in some c3 and c4 plants

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Amphistomatous C3 (Nicotiana tabacum L., Datura stramonium L.) and C4 (Sorghum saccharatum Pers. and Zea mays L.) species were examined to find how (if at all) their inherent differences in water-use economy are reflected in apparent cuticular transpiration or vice versa. Transpiration efficiency (TE) was calculated from steady state photosynthesis (A) and transpiration (E) rates estimated for the upper side of the leaf after light induction of stomata opening. Apparent cuticular transpiration ('Ec) was measured as the part of transpiration which was not eliminated by convective counteraction of the air stream passing across the amphistomatous leaf: total pressure difference (AP) across the leaf was increased and the minimal value of EΔPτ0 was taken as the apparent cuticular transpiration rate ('Ec). 'Ec was treated relative to E at AP equal to zero (EGDP=0), E'cr. Measurements were carried out under two leaf-air vapour pressure differences (VPD). Er (i.e. EGDPτ0/EGDP=0) versus GDP patterns differed qualitatively between the investigated C3 and C4 plants. TE increased and 'Ecr decreased from tobacco, stramony, maize to sorghum for both VPD of air. 'Ecr and TE were approximately linearly related, the slope being dependent on VPD. The increase in VPD resulted in larger E and slightly smaller epidermal conductance (g) at GDP equal to zero. Both E'cr and E'cr decreased markedly at the same time especially, for species with high TE. The results were considered as an indirect confirmation that E'c values estimated by the technique used reflect species-specific differences in external peristomatal and cuticular vapour loss, at least in a relative sense. © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Šantrůček, J. (1991). Transpiration efficiency and apparent cuticular transpiration in some c3 and c4 plants. Biologia Plantarum, 33(3), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897880

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free