SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts

42Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Isolation of low-abundance transcripts expressed in a genome remains a serious challenge in transcriptome studies. The sensitivity of the methods used for analysis has a direct impact on the efficiency of the detection. We compared the EST method and the SAGE method to determine which one is more sensitive and to what extent the sensitivity is great for the detection of low-abundance transcripts. Results: Using the same low-abundance transcripts detected by both methods as the targeted sequences, we observed that the SAGE method is 26 times more sensitive than the EST method for the detection of low-abundance transcripts. Conclusions: The SAGE method is more efficient than the EST method in detecting the low-abundance transcripts. ©2004 Sun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, M., Zhou, G., Lee, S., Chen, J., Shi, R. Z., & Wang, S. M. (2004). SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts. BMC Genomics, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free