Incorporating mythic and interpretive analysis in the investigation of hearing loss on the family farm

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite knowing about the dangers of hearing loss, farmers typically choose not to protect their hearing. Examining the myth of farm life, this study aims to discern whether rhetorical myths influence farmers' decisions to wear hearing protection. Researchers conducted 40 interviews with farmers regarding farm life and hearing loss. Results suggest that farmers typically do not use hearing protection; their answers reflect the myths of sacrifice and safety. Analysis demonstrates that knowledge of the relationship between myth and practice should impact future attempts to change farmers' behaviors. © 2010: Mark Meister, Theresa Hest, Ann Burnett, and Nova Southeastern University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meister, M., Hest, T., & Burnett, A. (2010). Incorporating mythic and interpretive analysis in the investigation of hearing loss on the family farm. Qualitative Report, 15(1), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free