Aim: Eltrombopag and romiplostim are US FDA approved for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in patients with insufficient response to other treatments. Clinical or real-world data comparing outcomes of the two drugs are limited. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study sought information on bleeding-related episodes (BREs), adverse events (AEs) and other outcomes of eltrombopag or romiplostim treatment in immune thrombocytopenia. Results: Patients receiving eltrombopag experienced significantly reduced BREs, severe BREs, rescue medication use and platelet transfusions. Diarrhea and headache were significantly less frequent in patients receiving eltrombopag; other AEs occurred equally in both groups. Conclusion: There may be a potential advantage for the use of eltrombopag versus romiplostim in the practice settings studied, based on rates of BREs and AEs and rescue medication utilization.
CITATION STYLE
Forsythe, A., Schneider, J., Pham, T., Bhor, M., Said, Q., Allepuz, A., … Roy, A. N. (2020). Real-world evidence on clinical outcomes in immune thrombocytopenia treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 9(7), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2019-0177
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.