How does problem-solving pedagogy affect creativity? A meta-analysis of empirical studies

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of problem-solving pedagogy on individual students’ creativity in different teaching contexts and conditions, and to examine the role of moderating variables that may affect the overall effect size. The study screened 19 relevant studies from the Web of Science for inclusion in the meta-analysis, and extracted 77 effect sizes from these studies that could be used in the meta-analysis. The study first explored the relationship between problem-solving pedagogy and the development of learner creativity, and further analysis focused on moderating variables to investigate the effects of instructional method, grouping method, grade level, problem-solving scaffolding, source of problems, the application of thinking tools, and the application of technology. The results showed that problem-solving pedagogy enhances students’ creativity, while at the same time, among the sources of problems, student-discovered problems are most conducive to creativity stimulation, while teacher-determined problems and problems that lead to student discovery are less effective in terms of promoting creativity. Among the grouping methods, heterogeneous grouping can better utilize the creativity cultivation effect of the problem-solving pedagogy than random grouping and homogeneous grouping. Among the different levels of grades, learners in elementary school are better able to gain creativity under the influence of problem-solving pedagogy than learners in middle school, high school, college, and those in on-the-job learning. However, this study did not reveal any significant benefits for creativity enhancement under the four conditions of instructional method, problem-solving scaffolding, thinking tools-assisted, or technology. The results of this study clarify the importance of problem-solving pedagogy for creativity development, and also reveal the actual effects of the various ways of applying problem-solving pedagogy on creativity development as well as the problems that exist, which provides inspiration for how to better utilize problem-solving pedagogy in the future.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

6069Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups

1748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis

487Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Design and application of RAG-based conversational agents for collaborative problem solving

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

First-Year University Students’ Perspectives on Their Psychological Safety in PBL Teams

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adolescents' Perceived Opportunities for Creative Thinking, Creative Thinking Competency Belief and Career Interest in STEM: Joint Consideration of Situated Expectancy-Value Beliefs and Gender

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhan, Z., He, L., & Zhong, X. (2024). How does problem-solving pedagogy affect creativity? A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1287082

Readers over time

‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

42%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

30%

Arts and Humanities 3

30%

Design 2

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0