Reciprocal trade agreements in Asia: Credible commitment to trade liberalization or paper tigers?

47Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reciprocal trade agreements (RTAs) have proliferated rapidly in Asia in recent years, an unprecedented phenomenon in a region in which state-led institution-building efforts were largely unsuccessful during the Cold War years. In this article, we investigate the qualitative provisions of RTAs in Asia, focusing on agreements that are professedly geared toward trade liberalization through reciprocal exchanges of trade concessions. We build on the concept of credible commitment- that states "tie their hands" through international agreements and thus signal strong commitment to trade liberalization. We argue that a broad range of agreement provisions will affect an RTA's ability to achieve its primary objective: trade liberalization. We present a coding scheme that measures the strength of a wide variety of provisions in the legal texts of RTAs. Using quantitative analysis, we analyze the impact of various components of Asia's RTAs on participants' trade flows.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hicks, R., & Kim, S. Y. (2012). Reciprocal trade agreements in Asia: Credible commitment to trade liberalization or paper tigers? Journal of East Asian Studies, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800007608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free