Depression and Anxiety in Times of COVID-19: How Coping Strategies and Loneliness Relate to Mental Health Outcomes and Academic Performance

34Citations
Citations of this article
150Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The link between depression, anxiety, and loneliness has been well established in the literature. Yet, the performance consequences of these negative mental health outcomes and the role of coping behaviors, as well as behavioral consequences such as procrastination as mediators have received far less research attention. Due to the COVID-19 social isolation restrictions, people are at risk of falling into a negative mental health spiral that can also affect their performance over time. The purpose of this longitudinal study among 881 first-year bachelor students is to explore the mechanisms by which loneliness, coping strategies in the context of COVID-19, mental health outcomes and procrastination sequentially mediate the relationship depression and anxiety on the one hand, and academic performance on the other hand. We measured mental health variables several times during the COVID-19 crisis and assessed how this translates into academic performance at the end of the academic year. By performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, three high-order factors for the coping strategies in the context of the COVID-19 crisis were identified, namely maladaptive coping, adaptive coping, and supportive coping. Structural equation modeling was used to test the sequential mediational model. The results showed that maladaptive coping strategies employed at T2 during the lockdown, but not adaptive or supportive coping partially mediate the trajectories of depression (T1) and anxiety (T1). Loneliness (T2) partially mediated the trajectory of depression and anxiety (T1), and procrastination fully mediated the impact of depression (T3) on academic performance (T4). These results help understand the mechanisms that influence mental health and academic performance outcomes in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Based on the study outcomes, educational researchers can test strategies to reduce the adverse effects of stressful situations in learning environments by targeting maladaptive coping behaviors and procrastination.

References Powered by Scopus

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure

31575Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7

20846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling

17991Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Procrastination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the COVID-19 crisis: An overview and proposed way forward

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors contributing to depressive symptoms among undergraduate nursing students: A cross-sectional study

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freyhofer, S., Ziegler, N., de Jong, E. M., & Schippers, M. C. (2021). Depression and Anxiety in Times of COVID-19: How Coping Strategies and Loneliness Relate to Mental Health Outcomes and Academic Performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682684

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 12

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

21%

Social Sciences 5

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free