A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities

31Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Recruitment to clinical trials remains poor, and patient knowledge of clinical trials is one barrier to recruitment. To identify knowledge deficits, we conducted and compared surveys measuring actual patient knowledge and clinical trialist priorities for patient knowledge. Methods Consenting patients at a tertiary cancer centre answered a survey that included • 2 opinion questions about their own knowledge and willingness to join a trial, and • 22 knowledge questions. Clinical researchers at the centre were asked 13 questions about the importance of various trials factors. Results Of 126 patients surveyed, 16% had joined a clinical trial, and 42% had a secondary school education or less. The mean correct response rate on the knowledge questions was 58%. Higher rates of correct responses were associated with lower age (p = 0.05), greater education (p = 0.006), prior trial participation (p < 0.001), agreement or strong agreement with perceived understanding of trials (p < 0.001), and willingness to join a clinical trial (p = 0.002). Trialists valued an understanding of the rationale for clinical trials and of randomization, placebo, and patient protection, but those particular topics were poorly understood by patients. Conclusions Patient knowledge about clinical trials is poor, including knowledge of several concepts ranked important by clinical trialists. The findings suggest that when developing education interventions, emphasis should be placed on the topics most directly related to patient care, and factors such as age and education level should be considered. © 2013 Multimed Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects

320Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature

234Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: A study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of saudis towards participating in clinical trials

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characteristics of clinical trials that require participants to be fluent in English

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camero, P., Pond, G. R., Xu, R. Y., Ellis, P. M., & Goffin, J. R. (2013). A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities. Current Oncology, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1323

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

67%

Researcher 7

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

56%

Psychology 6

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Social Sciences 4

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0