Futility and the care of the perioperative patient

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Futility in healthcare is an area of significant debate. Generally, a futile treatment is one that is incapable of producing a beneficial result. The degree of benefit required has been contentious in the ethics literature. Different definitions of futility have been proposed to arrive at a consensus regarding which treatments would be provided and to agree on futile interventions that could be withheld. However, each of these definitions has flaws. Some hospitals, healthcare organizations, and states have implemented policies to create a procedural approach to futility disputes. Several authors have advocated discarding the language of futility as it often is an expression of physician frustration and impedes communication between care providers, patients and their surrogates. Many resources are available to assist in difficult cases involving futility including preoperative risk calculators and institutional ethics committees, but, ultimately, the best tool in approaching these challenging situations is open and honest communication between the patient, or surrogate, and the physician.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grant, S. B., Modi, P. K., & Singer, E. A. (2015). Futility and the care of the perioperative patient. In Ethical Issues in Anesthesiology and Surgery (pp. 151–170). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15949-2_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free