The Distinctive Clinical Features of Paraneoplastic Sensory Neuronopathy

118Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A 15-year experience with paraneoplastic sensory neuronopathy at the Mayo Clinic is reviewed. Of 26 patients with paraneoplastic sensory neuronopathy, 19 had small cell lung cancer, 4 had breast cancer, and 3 had other neoplasms. There was a striking predominance of females (20:6). Neuropathic symptoms (pain, paresthesia, sensory loss) were asymmetric at onset, with a predilection for the upper limbs; in three patients, symptoms were confined to the arms. Electrophysiologic testing revealed absent sensory responses and normal or minimally altered motor responses. Slightly more than half the patients had associated autonomic, cerebellar, or cerebral abnormalities. In some patients, treatment of the neoplasm seemed to halt progression of the neuronopathy, but none had neurologic improvement and most continued to worsen, even when the oncologic response was good. Distinguishing between paraneoplastic and nonparaneoplastic sensory neuronopathies can be difficult, but prominent neuropathic pain, neurologic dysfunction involving more than the peripheral sensory system, or an increased cerebrospinal fluid protein value should prompt a careful search for a cancer. © 1992, Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chalk, C. H., Windebank, A. J., Kimmel, D. W., & Mcmanis, P. G. (1992). The Distinctive Clinical Features of Paraneoplastic Sensory Neuronopathy. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques, 19(3), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100041974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free