Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats

38Citations
Citations of this article
176Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bottom trawl fisheries are the most widespread source of anthropogenic physical disturbance to seabed habitats. Development of fisheries-, conservation- and ecosystem-based management strategies requires the selection of indicators of the impact of bottom trawling on the state of benthic biota. Many indicators have been proposed, but no rigorous test of a range of candidate indicators against nine commonly agreed criteria (concreteness, theoretical basis, public awareness, cost, measurement, historical data, sensitivity, responsiveness, specificity) has been performed. Here, we collated data from 41 studies that compared the benthic biota in trawled areas with those in control locations (that were either not trawled or trawled infrequently), examining seven potential indicators (numbers and biomass for individual taxa and whole communities, evenness, Shannon–Wiener diversity and species richness) to assess their performance against the set of nine criteria. The effects of trawling were stronger on whole-community numbers and biomass than for individual taxa. Species richness was also negatively affected by trawling but other measures of diversity were not. Community numbers and biomass met all criteria, taxa numbers and biomass and species richness satisfied most criteria, but evenness and Shannon–Wiener diversity did not respond to trawling and only met few criteria, and hence are not suitable state indicators of the effect of bottom trawling. Synthesis and applications. An evaluation of each candidate indicator against a commonly agreed suite of desirable properties coupled with the outputs of our meta-analysis showed that whole-community numbers of individuals and biomass are the most suitable indicators of bottom trawling impacts as they performed well on all criteria. Strengths of these indicators are that they respond strongly to trawling, relate directly to ecosystem functioning and are straightforward to measure. Evenness and Shannon–Wiener diversity are not responsive to trawling and unsuitable for the monitoring and assessment of bottom trawl impacts.

References Powered by Scopus

Introduction to Meta-Analysis

14512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration

2304Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing

435Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trawl impacts on the relative status of biotic communities of seabed sedimentary habitats in 24 regions worldwide

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trawl fishing impacts on the status of seabed fauna in diverse regions of the globe

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trait-based indices to assess benthic vulnerability to trawling and model loss of ecosystem functions

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hiddink, J. G., Kaiser, M. J., Sciberras, M., McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R., … Jennings, S. (2020). Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(7), 1199–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13617

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

52%

Researcher 28

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43

48%

Environmental Science 39

43%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

6%

Social Sciences 3

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free