Haematemesis and Melaena, with Special Reference to Factors Influencing the Outcome

254Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a study of 2,149 emergency admissions because of haematemesis or melaena during a 15-year period, the sex ratio, age distribution, and main diagnostic groups showed no major change. Various factors affected the prognosis, such as the age of the patient, the underlying diagnosis, a low blood pressure on arrival at hospital, gross anaemia on arrival there, and the pattern of bleeding after admission. The fatality rate remained virtually constant throughout the period studied in spite of changes in diagnostic methods and management. There was a changing pattern in the type of operation performed in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. Vagotomy combined with a drainage procedure and with a direct surgical attack on the bleeding point became more widely used at the expense of Polya or Billroth I partial gastrectomy and gave the best results. It is at first paradoxical that improved surgical results should not be reflected in a general improvement in the fatality rate, but this finding can be explained by the smaller proportion of patients treated by emergency surgery in the later years of the period studied. It is concluded that emergency surgery should be performed more frequently and that vagotomy plus drainage is the operation of choice in the peptic ulcer group. © 1970, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schiller, K. F. R., Truelove, S. C., & Williams, G. (1970). Haematemesis and Melaena, with Special Reference to Factors Influencing the Outcome. British Medical Journal, 2(5700), 7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5700.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free