Thinking about field research from ibero-america: 4 lines and 4 paradoxes

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The author discusses the paradoxical place of ethnographic fieldwork and of the location of anthropological knowledge in a discipline self-defined as universal and devoted to study the social-cultural diversity of Humanity. By means of her own academic trajectory in sev-eral stances of her ethnographic practice, Guber shows how fieldwork struggles to make its way amidst the written reflections on how we do anthropology away of metropolitan set-tings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guber, R. (2020). Thinking about field research from ibero-america: 4 lines and 4 paradoxes. AIBR Revista de Antropologia Iberoamericana, 15(3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.150302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free