The ambivalent implications of strong belonging for young people living in poor neighborhoods

11Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is a now a commonplace observation that globalization is widely transforming everyday lives, and this includes a practical and symbolic significance of neighborhoods. Experiences of personal and social belonging, grounded in positive attachments to local neighborhoods, have long been considered as important in promoting personal well-being and local social cooperation. Social connections with family and friends, however, are detaching from local neighborhood settings and becoming more spatially dispersed. Metaphors of movement and flow are increasingly used to evoke qualities of contemporary personal, social, and economic life. Social inclusion is conceived as being part of the flows, while problems of socio exclusion and marginalization are experienced as immobility. Paradoxically, neighborhoods are both less and more important in everyday life. They are less important because there is generally diminishing dependence on them to meet everyday needs for services, support, and companionship, yet they have heightening significance in providing access to social, economic, and symbolic resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warr, D. (2015). The ambivalent implications of strong belonging for young people living in poor neighborhoods. In Handbook of Children and Youth Studies (pp. 665–678). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-15-4_54

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free