EGFR mutation is positively correlated with C-Met protein expression: A study of 446 resected lung adenocarcinoma

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (C-Met) amplification are known factors for primary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in advanced primary lung adenocarcinoma. However, little is known about the relationship between high expression of C-Met protein and primary EGFR mutation. This research aims to investigate the correlation between EGFR mutation and C-Met protein expression in resected primary lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Four hundred and forty-six surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma between 2013-2015 were collected for EGFR mutation analysis by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and C-Met protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The relationship between the two biomarkers and clinicopathological features were analyzed. Results: The positive rate of EGFR mutation and C-Met protein expression were 66.4% (296/446) and 96.4% (430/446). EGFR mutation was significantly higher in female, mild to moderate differentiation, lepidic, acinar and papillary histological subtypes (P<0.05). C-Met expression was more prominent in female than male (201 vs. 123, 45.07% vs. 27.57%). EGFR mutation was found positively correlated with C-Met protein expression (P<0.05). Conclusions: EGFR mutation and C-Met protein expression are prone to have a female predominance, and are positively correlated with each other in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma specimens. This finding may be beneficial in explaining some of the resistance mechanisms of EGFR-mutated cases, which is worth further study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lei, H., Liu, L., Wei, J., Liu, Y., Ling, Y., Wang, X., … Yang, L. (2021). EGFR mutation is positively correlated with C-Met protein expression: A study of 446 resected lung adenocarcinoma. Translational Cancer Research, 10(1), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2202

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free