Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes

  • Abdala C
  • Dhar S
4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

DPOAE (2f1-f2) phase was measured across a 3-octave frequency range from two groups of newborns using ER10B+ and ER10C probe microphones. A marked phase shift was noted in the mid-to-high frequency range for newborn data recorded with the ER10C only. In contrast, the ER10B+ produced phase that was approximately invariant as a function of frequency for most of the range. Probe-related phase shifts can be effectively eliminated by correcting for variations in the phases of the primary tones. Results highlight the importance of detecting and correcting for system-related phase shifts so they are not misinterpreted as cochlear in origin.

References Powered by Scopus

Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs

612Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions

355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Breaking away: Violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Level dependence of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The breaking of cochlear scaling symmetry in human newborns and adults

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdala, C., & Dhar, S. (2010). Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), EL49–EL55. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3453415

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

67%

Researcher 3

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

35%

Engineering 5

29%

Neuroscience 3

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0