New guidelines on management of arterial hypertension: Key similarities and differences

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Steady increase in worldwide prevalence of hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular morbidity and mortality necessitate new approaches to the management of hypertensive patients. It's important to recognize that despite several differences the convergence of the 2017 ACC/AHA (US) and 2018 ESC/ESH (European) guidelines is greater now than ever before. The present review focuses on the key similarities and differences of these two documents. Among similarities we analyzed positions regarding the importance of cardiovascular risk evaluation for treatment initiation and choice of optimal treatment strategy: blood pressure (BP) treatment thresholds; drugs of choice for the initiation of antihypertensive therapy and treatment targets in different groups including elderly patients. Among key differences we analyzed sections concerning the classification of BP levels and target BP levels in patients with chronic kidney disease. In conclusion, we may say that in many ways the guidelines are just a different interpretation of the same data. There is no doubt in the importance of lowering high BP and evaluation and correction of high cardiovascular risk. One of the main purposes is to focus attention on younger patients with hypertension.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kobalava, Z. D., Troitskaya, E. A., & Kolesnik, E. L. (2019). New guidelines on management of arterial hypertension: Key similarities and differences. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology, 15(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-1-105-114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free