Colour-grapheme synesthesia affects binocular vision

2Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In colour-grapheme synesthesia, non-coloured graphemes are perceived as being inher-ently coloured. In recent years, it is debated whether visual processing of synesthesia-inducing achromatic graphemes is similar to that of chromatic graphemes. Here, we exploit the phenomenon of binocular rivalry in which incompatible images presented dichoptically compete for conscious expression. Importantly, the competition only arises if the two images are sufficiently different; if the difference between the images is small, the images will fuse into a single mixed percept. We show that achromatic digits that induce synes-thetic colour percepts increase the incidence of binocular rivalry compared to achromatic non-digits that do not evoke such percepts. That is, compared to achromatically perceived non-digits, synesthesia-inducing digits increase the predominance of binocular rivalry over binocular fusion. This finding shows that the synesthetic colour experience can provide the conditions for promoting binocular rivalry, much like stimulus features that induce rivalry in normal vision. © 2011 Paffen, van der Smagt and Nijboer.

References Powered by Scopus

Visual competition

1072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry

528Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

439Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Association between synesthetic colors and sensitivity to physical colors changed by type of synesthetic experience in grapheme-color synesthesia

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paffen, C. L. E., van der Smagt, M. J., & Nijboer, T. C. W. (2011). Colour-grapheme synesthesia affects binocular vision. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00314

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

50%

Researcher 7

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

53%

Neuroscience 3

16%

Engineering 3

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0