The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: A response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick

24Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The dominance of the biomedically informed view of disability, genetics, and diagnosis is explored. An understanding of the social nature of disability and genetics, especially in terms of oppression, adds a richer dimension to an understanding of ethical issues pertaining to genetics. This is much wider than the limited question of whether or not such technology discriminates. Instead, it is proposed that such technology will perpetuate the oppression and control of people with disability, especially if the knowledge of people with disability is not utilised in bioethical debates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newell, C. (1999). The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: A response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.2.172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free