Cost-effectiveness of the Namaste care family program for nursing home residents with advanced dementia in comparison with usual care: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

15Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a progressive disease that decreases quality of life of persons with dementia and is associated with high societal costs. The burden of caring for persons with dementia also decreases the quality of life of family caregivers. The objective of this study was to assess the societal cost-effectiveness of Namaste Care Family program in comparison with usual care in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Methods: Nursing homes were randomized to either Namaste Care Family program or usual care. Outcome measures of the cluster-randomized trial in 231 residents included Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID) and the Gain in Alzheimer Care Instrument (GAIN) for family caregivers over 12 months of follow-up. Health states were measured using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire which were translated into utilities. QALYs were calculated by multiplying the amount of time a participant spent in a specific health state with the utility score associated with that health state. Healthcare utilization costs were estimated using standard unit costs, while intervention costs were estimated using a bottom-up approach. Missing cost and effect data were imputed using multiple imputation. Bootstrapped multilevel models were used after multiple imputation. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were estimated. Results: The Namaste Care Family program was more effective than usual care in terms of QUALID (-0.062, 95%CI:-0.40 to 0.28), QALY (0.0017, 95%CI:-0.059 to 0.063) and GAIN (0.075, 95%CI:-0.20 to 0.35). Total societal costs were lower for the Namaste Care Family program as compared to usual care (-552 , 95%CI:-2920 to 1903). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The probability of cost-effectiveness at a ceiling ratio of 0 /unit of effect extra was 0.70 for the QUALID, QALY and GAIN. Conclusions: The Namaste Care Family program is dominant over usual care and, thus, cost-effective, although statistical uncertainty was considerable. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register (http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp, identifier: NL5570, date of registration: 2016/03/23).

References Powered by Scopus

Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice

6535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves - Facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions

733Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: A Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care

695Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Family involvement in the Namaste care family program for dementia: A qualitative study on experiences of family, nursing home staff, and volunteers

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cost-Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations and a Review of Reviews

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stimulating sense memories for people living with dementia using the Namaste Care programme: What works, how and why?

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El Alili, M., Smaling, H. J. A., Joling, K. J., Achterberg, W. P., Francke, A. L., Bosmans, J. E., & Van Der Steen, J. T. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of the Namaste care family program for nursing home residents with advanced dementia in comparison with usual care: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05570-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

67%

Researcher 7

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 26

58%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

18%

Social Sciences 6

13%

Psychology 5

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free