Translation, adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the ‘blue flags’ questionnaire

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To translate and culturally adapt the Swedish version of the ‘Blue flags’ questionnaire into Dutch and to examine the validity and reliability aspects of the Dutch version. Methods: The ‘Blue flags’ questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted to the Dutch situation. A total of 58 participants filled in the first questionnaire at baseline and 51 participants filled in the second questionnaire sent two weeks later. The data of the participants who filled in the first questionnaire was used to determine internal consistency, structural validity and concurrent validity. The data of the participants who filled in both questionnaires was used to determine test-retest reliability. Results: The internal consistency was good with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83. The structural validity was satisfactory with a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test of 0.75 and a significance of p

References Powered by Scopus

A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

17909Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures

9143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Making sense of Cronbach's alpha

8307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Westerweel, A., Heerkens, Y. F., Oswald, W., Post Sennehed, C., Stigmar, K., van Hees, S., … Hutting, N. (2022). Translation, adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the ‘blue flags’ questionnaire. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 24(6), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2021.1891283

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Researcher 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 3

60%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 19

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free