Effects of light, temperature and canopy position on net photosynthesis and isoprene emission from sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) leaves

162Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In June 1993, net photosynthetic rates, stomatal conductance and isoprene emission rates of sweetgum leaves (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) were measured at the top of the forest canopy (sun leaves) and within the canopy at a height of 8-10 m above ground level (shade leaves). Large differences in net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance were found between sun and shade leaves. Mean rates of isoprene emission, expressed on a leaf area basis, were significantly lower in shade leaves than in sun leaves (4.1 versus 17.1 nmol m-2 s-1); however, because specific leaf area of sun leaves was lower than that of shade leaves (0.0121 versus 0.0334 m2 g-1), the difference between sun and shade leaves was less, though still significant, when isoprene emissions were expressed on a dry mass basis (45.5 versus 29.0 μg C g-1 h-1). Saturation of both net photosynthesis and isoprene emission occurred at lower PPFDs in shade leaves than in sun leaves. The effect of leaf temperature on isoprene emissions also differed between sun and shade leaves. Sun leaves lost a significantly greater percentage of fixed carbon as isoprene than shade leaves. The leaf-level physiological measurements were used to derive parameters for a canopy-level isoprene flux model. The importance of incorporating differences between sun- and shade-leaf properties into existing models is discussed.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harley, P., Guenther, A., & Zimmerman, P. (1996). Effects of light, temperature and canopy position on net photosynthesis and isoprene emission from sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) leaves. Tree Physiology, 16(1–2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.25

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

48%

Researcher 25

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43

51%

Environmental Science 25

29%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 13

15%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0