A critique of ancillary tests for brain death

42Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The acceptance of brain death by society has allowed for the discontinuation of "life support" and the transplantation of organs. The standard clinical criteria for brain death, when rigorously applied, ensure that the brainstem is destroyed. Because more rostral structures are more vulnerable than the brainstem, these are almost invariably devastated when brainstem function is irreversibly lost as a result of whole brain insults. Then, clinical criteria for "brainstem death" ensure that "whole-brain death" is present. However, if the brainstem is selectively damaged or if brainstem function cannot be adequately assessed clinically, ancillary tests are needed to confirm whole-brain death with certainty. Ancillary tests are also required in very young children. In addition, some societies require their use as a matter of principle. Only tests of whole-brain perfusion adequately serve these purposes. Copyright © 2004 Humana Press Inc. All rights of any nature whatsoever are reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, G. B., & Lee, D. (2004). A critique of ancillary tests for brain death. Neurocritical Care. https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:1:4:499

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free